Philosophy
I didn't think this would be a serious issue but it has turned into a complex situation. Remote access to lectures and documents is not a bad thing but it will never replace classroom attendance. The professors' concerns "...about violating copyright by making materials available online, about having to censor their remarks, about whether filming lectures will stifle discussion or drive students to skip class, and about running afoul of departmental politics." may be misplaced.
We’ve all heard about university-driven open-education projects like MIT OpenCourseWare. These days, though, the push to freely publish course materials and research papers online is increasingly coming from students.
And some of them are bumping into a barrier: their own professors.
This weekend, Adi Kamdar and Parker Phinney joined campus activists from around the country at the Students for Free Culture conference here. Mr. Kamdar belongs to a Yale University student group campaigning for an open-access policy that would make scholarly papers freely available in an online repository (like the one at Harvard University, which has an opt-out rule). Mr. Phinney is prodding Dartmouth College to develop an open-courseware site for lecture videos and other materials (like the ones at Yale and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology).
They're both idealistic sophomores trying to pry open greater public access to their privileged Ivy League cocoons. An easy sell? Not quite. Over sandwiches at Potbelly Sandwich Shop during a break in the conference, both share similar struggles getting faculty members to budge.
"A lot of them just don't care," Mr. Kamdar says.
"In general, professors are very nervous," Mr. Phinney says. "Some are outright offended."
In talking with nearly a dozen professors, Mr. Phinney has heard their concern about violating copyright by making materials available online, about having to censor their remarks, about whether filming lectures will stifle discussion or drive students to skip class, and about running afoul of departmental politics. Mr. Kamdar finds professors generally supportive but also ambivalent, sentiments reflected in a series of faculty interviews that his group has published online.
The cases underscore how far universities are from the "free culture" advocated at the conference. Students for Free Culture, whose name parallels a book by Harvard cyberlaw guru Lawrence Lessig, consists of more than 40 campus chapters that care about intellectual-property policies and "digital civil liberties." It's probably the only student group more likely to use the initials "JZ" as a reference to the Internet legal scholar Jonathan Zittrain than the rapper Jay-Z. The group's genesis was a 2003 controversy involving two Swarthmore College students who had posted leaked memoranda from a company that makes computer voting machines.
At this week's conference, a more recent case grabbed their attention: the decision by the University of California at Los Angeles to stop posting copyrighted videos on course Web sites after complaints from an educational-media trade group.
Patricia Aufderheide, director of the Center for Social Media at American University, described the capitulation as a "really dangerous" signal that was "bad for everybody else." She urged students to "push back."
Another conference participant shared a story of how much one student can get done when he does push -- hard.
Like Mr. Phinney, Kevin Donovan had an ambition to build an open-courseware Web site, this one amid the "not-so-free culture" of Georgetown University, as one blog put it. Mr. Donovan, a junior in Georgetown's School of Foreign Service, wants to see first-class education available to the third world. He argues that open courses make sense, given Georgetown's Jesuit tradition of social responsibility.
The dean of his school bought his pitch, which carries a valuable lesson for fellow student organizers: once you obtain that kind of high-level support, things get a lot easier. The open-courseware project became Mr. Donovan's summer job. Working with faculty and the Center for New Designs in Learning and Scholarship, Mr. Donovan helped put six courses online last year. He hopes to build on that start in the coming semester.
- Dissent From A Philosophy Department About Online Courses
"Professors at San Jose State Criticize Online Courses" by Tamar Lewin May 2nd, 2013 The New York Times San Jose State University has publicly committed to using online courses to bring in more students — and bring down costs — but its philosophy...
- Online Classes...having Problems
"The Trouble With Online College" February 18th, 2013 The New York Times Stanford University ratcheted up interest in online education when a pair of celebrity professors attracted more than 150,000 students from around the world to a noncredit, open...
- E-books At School Update
"Moving Into a Digital Future, Where Textbooks Are History" by Tamar Lewin August 9th, 2009 The New York Times At Empire High School in Vail, Ariz., students use computers provided by the school to get their lessons, do their homework and hear podcasts...
- "youtube"...venue For Instruction And Knowledge?
Frankly, it has great potential. It offers the ability for students and non-students [the general public] to witness college lectures for free. They can be viewed over and over, sometimes down loadable, and even embedded [as done here at POSP]. In...
- Free Digital Texts...a Start
Well, it is a start. Despite the expense of the books and the fact that something is being done to assist students with the texts, it is still cool to have a real book at hand. "Free digital texts begin to challenge costly college textbooks in California"...
Philosophy
Open Education...a good and needed program?
I didn't think this would be a serious issue but it has turned into a complex situation. Remote access to lectures and documents is not a bad thing but it will never replace classroom attendance. The professors' concerns "...about violating copyright by making materials available online, about having to censor their remarks, about whether filming lectures will stifle discussion or drive students to skip class, and about running afoul of departmental politics." may be misplaced.
"Students' Push for Open Education Meets Faculty Ambivalence"
by
Marc Parry
February 15th, 2010
The Chronicle of Higher Education
by
Marc Parry
February 15th, 2010
The Chronicle of Higher Education
We’ve all heard about university-driven open-education projects like MIT OpenCourseWare. These days, though, the push to freely publish course materials and research papers online is increasingly coming from students.
And some of them are bumping into a barrier: their own professors.
This weekend, Adi Kamdar and Parker Phinney joined campus activists from around the country at the Students for Free Culture conference here. Mr. Kamdar belongs to a Yale University student group campaigning for an open-access policy that would make scholarly papers freely available in an online repository (like the one at Harvard University, which has an opt-out rule). Mr. Phinney is prodding Dartmouth College to develop an open-courseware site for lecture videos and other materials (like the ones at Yale and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology).
They're both idealistic sophomores trying to pry open greater public access to their privileged Ivy League cocoons. An easy sell? Not quite. Over sandwiches at Potbelly Sandwich Shop during a break in the conference, both share similar struggles getting faculty members to budge.
"A lot of them just don't care," Mr. Kamdar says.
"In general, professors are very nervous," Mr. Phinney says. "Some are outright offended."
In talking with nearly a dozen professors, Mr. Phinney has heard their concern about violating copyright by making materials available online, about having to censor their remarks, about whether filming lectures will stifle discussion or drive students to skip class, and about running afoul of departmental politics. Mr. Kamdar finds professors generally supportive but also ambivalent, sentiments reflected in a series of faculty interviews that his group has published online.
The cases underscore how far universities are from the "free culture" advocated at the conference. Students for Free Culture, whose name parallels a book by Harvard cyberlaw guru Lawrence Lessig, consists of more than 40 campus chapters that care about intellectual-property policies and "digital civil liberties." It's probably the only student group more likely to use the initials "JZ" as a reference to the Internet legal scholar Jonathan Zittrain than the rapper Jay-Z. The group's genesis was a 2003 controversy involving two Swarthmore College students who had posted leaked memoranda from a company that makes computer voting machines.
At this week's conference, a more recent case grabbed their attention: the decision by the University of California at Los Angeles to stop posting copyrighted videos on course Web sites after complaints from an educational-media trade group.
Patricia Aufderheide, director of the Center for Social Media at American University, described the capitulation as a "really dangerous" signal that was "bad for everybody else." She urged students to "push back."
Another conference participant shared a story of how much one student can get done when he does push -- hard.
Like Mr. Phinney, Kevin Donovan had an ambition to build an open-courseware Web site, this one amid the "not-so-free culture" of Georgetown University, as one blog put it. Mr. Donovan, a junior in Georgetown's School of Foreign Service, wants to see first-class education available to the third world. He argues that open courses make sense, given Georgetown's Jesuit tradition of social responsibility.
The dean of his school bought his pitch, which carries a valuable lesson for fellow student organizers: once you obtain that kind of high-level support, things get a lot easier. The open-courseware project became Mr. Donovan's summer job. Working with faculty and the Center for New Designs in Learning and Scholarship, Mr. Donovan helped put six courses online last year. He hopes to build on that start in the coming semester.
- Dissent From A Philosophy Department About Online Courses
"Professors at San Jose State Criticize Online Courses" by Tamar Lewin May 2nd, 2013 The New York Times San Jose State University has publicly committed to using online courses to bring in more students — and bring down costs — but its philosophy...
- Online Classes...having Problems
"The Trouble With Online College" February 18th, 2013 The New York Times Stanford University ratcheted up interest in online education when a pair of celebrity professors attracted more than 150,000 students from around the world to a noncredit, open...
- E-books At School Update
"Moving Into a Digital Future, Where Textbooks Are History" by Tamar Lewin August 9th, 2009 The New York Times At Empire High School in Vail, Ariz., students use computers provided by the school to get their lessons, do their homework and hear podcasts...
- "youtube"...venue For Instruction And Knowledge?
Frankly, it has great potential. It offers the ability for students and non-students [the general public] to witness college lectures for free. They can be viewed over and over, sometimes down loadable, and even embedded [as done here at POSP]. In...
- Free Digital Texts...a Start
Well, it is a start. Despite the expense of the books and the fact that something is being done to assist students with the texts, it is still cool to have a real book at hand. "Free digital texts begin to challenge costly college textbooks in California"...