Philosophy
- On Epiphenomenal Qualia And Lacrosse
Justin asks, I'm trying to figure out how to phrase this. I recall talking in one of my philosophy courses that if someone makes a sudden movement, apparently the neurons the cause the muscle movements fire before the ones in our brain that allow...
- Philosophy: Brain In A Vat Argument ? Truth Revealed
Brains in a vat? That sounds terrifying, doesn?t it? Brain in a vat argument is one of the newest thought experiments in philosophy of mind (discussed by John Pollock). Many people raise objection to the brain in a vat theory but are there in fact any...
- Property Dualism: Physicalism In Disguise?
Property dualism scheme Do you think it is possible to combine the physicalism (materialism) with the substance dualism? (If you don?t know the differences between these two check out the previous post.) For centuries people have tried to find common...
- Physical Monism Vs. Substance Dualism - Arguments
In the last post we?ve been dealing generally with the differences between the two major schools which are monism and dualism. It?s time we take a closer look to one of the most popular branches of the dualism ? substance dualism. It states that there...
- 6. Eliminative Materialism
What is eliminative materialism? Please elaborate. Some scientists try to get a better understanding of consciousness with the process of eliminative materialism. If they can not understand a phenomenon with the use of mathematics, they use academic...
Philosophy
Psychophysical parallelism explained
 |
| Gustav Theodor Fechner (1801-1887) |
Theory of psychophysical parallelism states that mental and physical experiences occur simultaneously and are not necessarily bound by any causal interaction. The theory was established in the early 19th century by a German philosopher Gustav Theodor Fechner (who is also famous for Weber-Fechner law). While psychophysical parallelism definition might seem a bit unclear, the theory is very interesting and is one of few philosophical theories which have been accepted by numerous scientists. To better understand Fechner?s approach to mind-body problem a little historical background would be helpful.
In the middle of the 19th century, with a more and more rapid progression of scientific thought, many philosophers became interested in explaining the nature of mind and body interaction. This lead to a famous materialism dispute as the opponents of metaphysical philosophy gained many supporters (Vogt, Büchner, Moleschott). Materialistic approach to mind-body dichotomy was at that time seen as very radical, and some of its points still cause much controversy in the 21st century:
 |
| Gottfried Wilhelm von Leibniz (1646-1716) |
Thoughts issue from the brain just as gall is produced by the liver or urine by the kidneys.
Carl Vogt
Are our thoughts just like other bodily fluids which are generated in a similar way as numbers in computer programmes? Are we just very sophisticated machines? Gustav Fechner claimed to be able to give the solution to materialism debate. His theory, known as psychophysical parallelism, was first mentioned in 1820s but it was not until 1860 that his approach became widely known, thanks to his mature work Elements of Psychophysics.
There are many misconceptions about the meaning of psychophysical parallelism ? many people seem to confuse it with occasionalism, preestablished harmony and Cartesian doctrine of two noninteracting substances. You may read on other websites that psychophysical parallelism is a theory established by Leibniz. It is true that psychophysical parallelism is partially congruent with Leibniz?s theory of noncausal conformity of the soul and the organic body. However, a very important difference is that Fechner rejected any theological grounds for his theory and therefore ? even though psychophysical parallelism is a dualistic conception ? by no means should it be confused with statements made either by Descartes or Leibniz. Fechner?s theory states that while mental and physical states are not causally dependent they are functionally dependent.
What does it mean? It means that to every mental event there is a corresponding brain event. It does not claim causal interaction, it does not deny it. It refrains from explaining the nature of mind and body. It is a very open and metaphysics-free theory. By many it is treated as a good and neutral foundation for more detailed explanations of the nature of mind and body problem albeit the theory itself does not answer many questions.
Do you agree with Theodor Fechner?s theory of psychophysical parallelism? Share your thoughts and if you enjoyed the post, please don?t forget to like our Mind and Philosophy Facebook page!
- On Epiphenomenal Qualia And Lacrosse
Justin asks, I'm trying to figure out how to phrase this. I recall talking in one of my philosophy courses that if someone makes a sudden movement, apparently the neurons the cause the muscle movements fire before the ones in our brain that allow...
- Philosophy: Brain In A Vat Argument ? Truth Revealed
Brains in a vat? That sounds terrifying, doesn?t it? Brain in a vat argument is one of the newest thought experiments in philosophy of mind (discussed by John Pollock). Many people raise objection to the brain in a vat theory but are there in fact any...
- Property Dualism: Physicalism In Disguise?
Property dualism scheme Do you think it is possible to combine the physicalism (materialism) with the substance dualism? (If you don?t know the differences between these two check out the previous post.) For centuries people have tried to find common...
- Physical Monism Vs. Substance Dualism - Arguments
In the last post we?ve been dealing generally with the differences between the two major schools which are monism and dualism. It?s time we take a closer look to one of the most popular branches of the dualism ? substance dualism. It states that there...
- 6. Eliminative Materialism
What is eliminative materialism? Please elaborate. Some scientists try to get a better understanding of consciousness with the process of eliminative materialism. If they can not understand a phenomenon with the use of mathematics, they use academic...