Philosophy
So what. It just limits news from those that cannot afford a subscription. But this may well be the wave of the future...unfortunately. They do allow 20 contacts per month for non-subscribers and there is another way to access a desired article. Find a link listed by Google. NYT does not count a link from Google towards the monthly cap.
The New York Times Company Thursday issued its first quarterly results since implementing digital subscriptions and a tiered paywall at nytimes.com. Even though the Times has ended its unlimited web free-for-all, the site seems to have been able to make more money serving up online ads to paying subscribers.
While the News Media Group’s total revenue dipped 2.2 percent to $576.7 million, digital advertising revenues rose 15.5 percent to $58.2 million.
How many readers had unlimited access to those ads? Well over a million, including roughly 224,000 new digital subscribers to nytimes.com and its associated mobile applications. Another 100,000 or so free digital subscriptions were sponsored by Lincoln for “highly engaged users,” while about 57,000 subscribed to digital and replica editions on e-readers including the Kindle and Nook. Approximately 756,000 print subscribers with linked accounts round out the total digital readership.
Print subscriptions to the NYT were down, but their decline has slowed, partly due to bundling of new home delivery signups with digital subscriptions. Staunching this loss is crucial, since the bulk of the paper’s revenue still comes from print advertising, down 6.4 percent in the quarter.
This is the major justification for “the Sunday loophole“: a print subscription to the Sunday NYT (which comes with full digital access to its web site and mobile apps) costs less than digital access alone. To keep print ad revenue from falling further, the paper needs eyeballs, no more so than on Sunday.
The New York Times Company as a whole reported a loss of $114.1 million for the quarter, driven largely by a $161.3 million writedown of assets held mostly by its regional papers. The About Group’s revenues also decreased 17.3 percent to $27.8 million; About.com suffered from a major loss of Google-juice after the search giant deployed new ranking algorithms aimed at making so-called content farms less prominent in search results.
As a viable digital business, by comparison, journalism is looking better and better.
For now, it looks like the digital paywall, complex as it may have first seemed, successfully serves multiple ends: a new digital subscription revenue stream, better sales of targeted and national digital ads, and a new cohort of digital-first, print-second home subscribers. Not bad news for the Gray Lady.
- Two Blows This Week: At&t And The New York Times
Both of these news items involve "money" and a way of limiting the user. AT&T announced that they will limit DSL customers to 125G/month. Anything over that will cost more. They failed to explain how the user was to monitor their usage. And The New...
- The Oed In Print No More?
"The Oxford English Dictionary Definitions of ‘Print’ And ‘Digital’" by Tim Carmody August 30th, 2010 Wired The 20-volume Oxford English Dictionary is the bibliophile’s equivalent to the movie geek’s high-end home theater setup. It’s...
- Goodbye "nyt"
This will be a cascading feature throughout the Internet. The New York Times announced today that it will be introducing a paid model for NYTimes.com at the beginning of 2011. The new approach, referred to as the metered model, will offer users free...
- News Publishers Keep Pushing For Fees
It appears that the movement by big news publishers to charge for online information is attempting to find strength in numbers [of individual publishers]. It categorically won't work. The Wall Street Journal has been cited for the success of such...
- Acs Chemistry Journals...no Longer In Print
I am not so sure that this is a good idea. "Chemistry Journals Go Digital-Only" by Josh Fischman July 10th, 2009 The Chronicle of Higher Education The American Chemical Society, which publishes several dozen academic journals, is moving to end print...
Philosophy
NYT Paywall appears to draw new revenues
So what. It just limits news from those that cannot afford a subscription. But this may well be the wave of the future...unfortunately. They do allow 20 contacts per month for non-subscribers and there is another way to access a desired article. Find a link listed by Google. NYT does not count a link from Google towards the monthly cap.
"Post-Paywall New York Times Boosts Digital Ad/Sub Dollars"
by
Tim Carmody
July 21st, 2011
Wired
by
Tim Carmody
July 21st, 2011
Wired
The New York Times Company Thursday issued its first quarterly results since implementing digital subscriptions and a tiered paywall at nytimes.com. Even though the Times has ended its unlimited web free-for-all, the site seems to have been able to make more money serving up online ads to paying subscribers.
While the News Media Group’s total revenue dipped 2.2 percent to $576.7 million, digital advertising revenues rose 15.5 percent to $58.2 million.
How many readers had unlimited access to those ads? Well over a million, including roughly 224,000 new digital subscribers to nytimes.com and its associated mobile applications. Another 100,000 or so free digital subscriptions were sponsored by Lincoln for “highly engaged users,” while about 57,000 subscribed to digital and replica editions on e-readers including the Kindle and Nook. Approximately 756,000 print subscribers with linked accounts round out the total digital readership.
Print subscriptions to the NYT were down, but their decline has slowed, partly due to bundling of new home delivery signups with digital subscriptions. Staunching this loss is crucial, since the bulk of the paper’s revenue still comes from print advertising, down 6.4 percent in the quarter.
This is the major justification for “the Sunday loophole“: a print subscription to the Sunday NYT (which comes with full digital access to its web site and mobile apps) costs less than digital access alone. To keep print ad revenue from falling further, the paper needs eyeballs, no more so than on Sunday.
The New York Times Company as a whole reported a loss of $114.1 million for the quarter, driven largely by a $161.3 million writedown of assets held mostly by its regional papers. The About Group’s revenues also decreased 17.3 percent to $27.8 million; About.com suffered from a major loss of Google-juice after the search giant deployed new ranking algorithms aimed at making so-called content farms less prominent in search results.
As a viable digital business, by comparison, journalism is looking better and better.
For now, it looks like the digital paywall, complex as it may have first seemed, successfully serves multiple ends: a new digital subscription revenue stream, better sales of targeted and national digital ads, and a new cohort of digital-first, print-second home subscribers. Not bad news for the Gray Lady.
- Two Blows This Week: At&t And The New York Times
Both of these news items involve "money" and a way of limiting the user. AT&T announced that they will limit DSL customers to 125G/month. Anything over that will cost more. They failed to explain how the user was to monitor their usage. And The New...
- The Oed In Print No More?
"The Oxford English Dictionary Definitions of ‘Print’ And ‘Digital’" by Tim Carmody August 30th, 2010 Wired The 20-volume Oxford English Dictionary is the bibliophile’s equivalent to the movie geek’s high-end home theater setup. It’s...
- Goodbye "nyt"
This will be a cascading feature throughout the Internet. The New York Times announced today that it will be introducing a paid model for NYTimes.com at the beginning of 2011. The new approach, referred to as the metered model, will offer users free...
- News Publishers Keep Pushing For Fees
It appears that the movement by big news publishers to charge for online information is attempting to find strength in numbers [of individual publishers]. It categorically won't work. The Wall Street Journal has been cited for the success of such...
- Acs Chemistry Journals...no Longer In Print
I am not so sure that this is a good idea. "Chemistry Journals Go Digital-Only" by Josh Fischman July 10th, 2009 The Chronicle of Higher Education The American Chemical Society, which publishes several dozen academic journals, is moving to end print...