Philosophy
Drawing was a terribly important part of science until the mid-19th century. Without photography, scientists, particularly in the life sciences, had to document what they saw with painstaking illustrations.
The clarity and "realness" of photographs eventually relegated scientific drawing to a hobby, but it didn't happen overnight. Photographers working at the microscopic scale had to devise new emulsion chemistries and types of equipment to capture clear images of tiny things.
Leading the charge was Auguste-Adolphe Bertsch, who worked to overcome any challenge that scientists threw at him. Unfortunately, he died during leftist social unrest in France in 1871. As a result, his pioneering work languished in the archives of the French photography society, Société française de photographie, until Corey Keller dug them up for her new exhibit about early scientific photography, Brought to Light Photography and the Invisible, at San Francisco's Museum of Modern Art.
"Photographers would deposit their pictures with this organization sort of as a way of staking their claim to achievements," Keller told Wired.com. "So these pictures went there directly from the man who made them and have been there ever since."
Even as they solved technical challenges, the photographers faced social resistance. The idea of representing a specific living thing instead of a generalized abstraction of an organism forced scientists to let go of long-held notions about their discipline.
"Prior to the 19th century, the scientific illustrations tend to represent a type, an ideal. So if you were going to do a picture of a flower, for example, the illustrator would look at 20 flowers and then take the common features and make an ideal flower," said Keller. "So, if that particular one happens to have a defective petal or something peculiar to it, you never really know: Does that photograph substitute then for that type of flower in general, or does it only represent that one specimen?"
While it may have posed a challenge for scientists of the 19th century, it's the unique nature of each photograph taken during this early period that wows us, even now.
Brought to Light: Photography and the Invisible, 1840-1900
Corey Keller [editor]
ISBN-10: 0300142102
ISBN-13: 978-0300142105
Brought to Light invites readers to step back to a time when photography, X-rays, and movies were new, when forays into the world beneath the skin or the realm beyond our everyday vision captivated scientists and the public alike. In this book, accounts of scientific experimentation blend with stories of showmanship to reveal how developments in 19th-century technology could enlighten as well as frighten and amaze. Through a series of 200 vintage images—produced by photographers, scientists, and amateur inventors—this book ultimately traces the rise of popular science.
The images demonstrate early experiments with microscopes, telescopes, electricity and magnetism, motion studies, X-rays and radiation, and spirit photography. We learn how these pictures circulated among the public, whether through the press, world’s fairs, or theaters. What started out as scientific progress, however, often took on the trappings of magic and superstition, as photography was enlisted to offer visual evidence of clairvoyance, spirits, and other occult influences.
With beautifully reproduced plates and engaging narratives, this book embodies the aesthetic pleasures and excitement of the tale it tells.
[Corey Keller is associate curator of photography at the San Francisco Museum of Modern Art. Jennifer Tucker is associate professor of History at Wesleyan University. Tom Gunning is professor of Art History at the University of Chicago.]
I noticed that Amazon.com has reduced the price from $50 to $31.50. Christmas is soon.
- Has Digital Photography Removed The Art?
A local paper is doing a piece on Einstein's Jewish Science and they sent a photographer to my office yesterday. Nice guy, I'm sure he's good at what he does. Put me in a few places in different settings and poses and laid on the shutter taking...
- Deceased--horacio Coppola
Horacio Coppola July 31st, 1906 to June 18th, 2012 "Horacio Coppola, Evocative Argentine Photographer, Dies at 105" by Denise Grady June 30th, 2012 The New York Times Horacio Coppola, whose black-and-white photographs of the cafes, side streets...
- Deceased--richard Steinheimer
Richard Steinheimer August 23rd, 1929 to May 4th, 2011 "Richard Steinheimer dies at 81; pre-eminent railroad photographer" He recorded the industry's transition from steam to diesel, perched atop speeding trains to photograph their motion, and took...
- "digital/traditional Photography" Poll
Other than digital photography, have you participated in traditional photography? Yes...3 No...1 Convenience, ease, speed, cost--hallmarks of the digital era of photography. Yes, things change but the experience of "doing" photography in the traditional...
- First Astronomy Photograph--daguerreotype Of The Moon
Earliest known photograph of the Moon...a daguerreotype taken in 1851. John Adams Whipple [Louis Daguerre took the first photograph of the Moon in 1839 but none survive for on March 8, 1839 Daguerre's laboratory burned to the ground, destroying the...
Philosophy
Microphotographs...cool
"Rare Microphotographs Resurface After 150 Years"
by
Alexis Madrigal
November 19th, 2008
Wired.com
by
Alexis Madrigal
November 19th, 2008
Wired.com
Drawing was a terribly important part of science until the mid-19th century. Without photography, scientists, particularly in the life sciences, had to document what they saw with painstaking illustrations.
The clarity and "realness" of photographs eventually relegated scientific drawing to a hobby, but it didn't happen overnight. Photographers working at the microscopic scale had to devise new emulsion chemistries and types of equipment to capture clear images of tiny things.
Leading the charge was Auguste-Adolphe Bertsch, who worked to overcome any challenge that scientists threw at him. Unfortunately, he died during leftist social unrest in France in 1871. As a result, his pioneering work languished in the archives of the French photography society, Société française de photographie, until Corey Keller dug them up for her new exhibit about early scientific photography, Brought to Light Photography and the Invisible, at San Francisco's Museum of Modern Art.
"Photographers would deposit their pictures with this organization sort of as a way of staking their claim to achievements," Keller told Wired.com. "So these pictures went there directly from the man who made them and have been there ever since."
Even as they solved technical challenges, the photographers faced social resistance. The idea of representing a specific living thing instead of a generalized abstraction of an organism forced scientists to let go of long-held notions about their discipline.
"Prior to the 19th century, the scientific illustrations tend to represent a type, an ideal. So if you were going to do a picture of a flower, for example, the illustrator would look at 20 flowers and then take the common features and make an ideal flower," said Keller. "So, if that particular one happens to have a defective petal or something peculiar to it, you never really know: Does that photograph substitute then for that type of flower in general, or does it only represent that one specimen?"
While it may have posed a challenge for scientists of the 19th century, it's the unique nature of each photograph taken during this early period that wows us, even now.
Brought to Light: Photography and the Invisible, 1840-1900Corey Keller [editor]
ISBN-10: 0300142102
ISBN-13: 978-0300142105
Brought to Light invites readers to step back to a time when photography, X-rays, and movies were new, when forays into the world beneath the skin or the realm beyond our everyday vision captivated scientists and the public alike. In this book, accounts of scientific experimentation blend with stories of showmanship to reveal how developments in 19th-century technology could enlighten as well as frighten and amaze. Through a series of 200 vintage images—produced by photographers, scientists, and amateur inventors—this book ultimately traces the rise of popular science.
The images demonstrate early experiments with microscopes, telescopes, electricity and magnetism, motion studies, X-rays and radiation, and spirit photography. We learn how these pictures circulated among the public, whether through the press, world’s fairs, or theaters. What started out as scientific progress, however, often took on the trappings of magic and superstition, as photography was enlisted to offer visual evidence of clairvoyance, spirits, and other occult influences.
With beautifully reproduced plates and engaging narratives, this book embodies the aesthetic pleasures and excitement of the tale it tells.
[Corey Keller is associate curator of photography at the San Francisco Museum of Modern Art. Jennifer Tucker is associate professor of History at Wesleyan University. Tom Gunning is professor of Art History at the University of Chicago.]
I noticed that Amazon.com has reduced the price from $50 to $31.50. Christmas is soon.
- Has Digital Photography Removed The Art?
A local paper is doing a piece on Einstein's Jewish Science and they sent a photographer to my office yesterday. Nice guy, I'm sure he's good at what he does. Put me in a few places in different settings and poses and laid on the shutter taking...
- Deceased--horacio Coppola
Horacio Coppola July 31st, 1906 to June 18th, 2012 "Horacio Coppola, Evocative Argentine Photographer, Dies at 105" by Denise Grady June 30th, 2012 The New York Times Horacio Coppola, whose black-and-white photographs of the cafes, side streets...
- Deceased--richard Steinheimer
Richard Steinheimer August 23rd, 1929 to May 4th, 2011 "Richard Steinheimer dies at 81; pre-eminent railroad photographer" He recorded the industry's transition from steam to diesel, perched atop speeding trains to photograph their motion, and took...
- "digital/traditional Photography" Poll
Other than digital photography, have you participated in traditional photography? Yes...3 No...1 Convenience, ease, speed, cost--hallmarks of the digital era of photography. Yes, things change but the experience of "doing" photography in the traditional...
- First Astronomy Photograph--daguerreotype Of The Moon
Earliest known photograph of the Moon...a daguerreotype taken in 1851. John Adams Whipple [Louis Daguerre took the first photograph of the Moon in 1839 but none survive for on March 8, 1839 Daguerre's laboratory burned to the ground, destroying the...