Philosophy
This stuff will not go away..."X Files"...British style.
LONDON:
The men were air traffic controllers. Experienced, calm professionals. Nobody was drinking.
What they saw has never been explained. And they were so worried about losing their jobs that they demanded their names be kept off the official reports.
No one, they knew, would believe their claim that an unidentified flying object landed at the airfield they were overseeing in the east of England, touched down briefly, then took off again at tremendous speed.
But that's what they reported happening at four in the afternoon on April 19, 1984, at an unspecified small airport near the eastern coast of England. Their "Report of Unusual Aerial Phenomenon'' is one of more than 1,000 pages of formerly secret UFO documents released Wednesday by the National Archives.
The air traffic controllers, each with more than eight years on the job, describe how they were helping guide a small plane to a safe landing on runway 22 when they were distracted by a brightly lit object approaching a different runway without clearance.
"Everyone became aware that the object was unidentified,'' the report on the incident said. "SATCO (codename for a controller with 14 years experience) reports that the object came in 'at speed,' made a touch and go on runway 27, then departed at 'terrific speed' in a 'near vertical' climb.''
The incident is one of the more credible in the newly public files because it was reported by air traffic controllers, said David Clarke, a UFO expert who has worked with the National Archives on the document release.
"They were absolutely astonished,'' he said. "It was a bright, circular object, flashing different colors, and after it touched down it disappeared at fantastic speed. The report comes from very qualified people, and it's one of the few that remained unexplained.''
He said other incidents were at times reported by aircraft crews whose members also asked to remain anonymous because they did not want to jeopardize their careers by seeming to believe in UFOs.
In one case, the pilot of a commercial plane crossing the Atlantic reported an unidentified object just 1.5 nautical miles from his wing. He speculated that it might be a meteor or a missile.
Although there are some unexplained cases, there is no reported instance in which Britain's Ministry of Defense found any evidence of alien activity or alien spacecraft, said Clarke, who nonetheless expects conspiracy theories about a UFO coverup by the British defense establishment to persist.
"The Ministry of Defense doesn't have any evidence that our defenses were breached by alien craft,'' he said. "They never found one, no bits of one, that's all we can say.''
Clarke said the documents released Wednesday, dealing with the late 1970s and early 1980s, are the first batch of a series that will be made public in the next few years.
The National Archives is releasing the files now because of numerous Freedom of Information requests seeking information about the government's UFO reports. Officials said names of many individuals had been blacked out to protect their privacy and the entire files had been reviewed to make sure their release did not compromise national security.
Ministry of Defense officials indicate in the files that UFO reports were only investigated to make sure that no enemy aircraft had illegally entered British airspace. This was crucial during the Cold War when Russian planes posed an ongoing threat.
But officials say they did not try to solve the UFO riddles once an enemy attack had been ruled out.
The vast majority of the reports come from members of the public who see strange things in the sky and jump to the conclusion that a UFO is involved even though there is likely a logical scientific explanation for what they are observing, experts say.
"Mostly it's well-intentioned witnesses who are misidentifying things,'' said Nick Pope, another UFO expert who helped the Ministry of Defense investigate the phenomenon. "The most common things are aircraft lights, bright stars and planets, satellites, meteors, airships and things like that.''
Some of the reports are fairly easy to explain — and quite possibly influenced by a pint or two of beer. This was the case when a number of people leaving a Tunbridge Wells pub at 9:30 at night reported seeing a strange craft "with red and green'' lights.
Asked by police where it seemed to be traveling, the pub crawlers said it appeared to be heading for London's Gatwick Airport.
Case closed.
It didn't take a scientist to figure out it was a commercial plane making a routine approach.
The National Archives
I doubt if the truth is out there as claimed here...more of a psychological/social dependency?
Myths/science; science/myths--needed...compatible?
- Blame Kenneth Arnold For The "flying Saucer"
"The Man Who Introduced the World to Flying Saucers" Kenneth Arnold saw something, said something, and ushered in the UFO-industrial complex. by Megan Garber June 15th 2014 The Atlantic The plan was to launch a flying saucer. NASA's supersonic...
- Contingency Plan?...why Bother
UFO Flying Over China July 7th 2010 "If Mars Attacks …Do we have an alien-contact contingency plan?" by Juliet Lapidos July 16th, 2010 Slate The Chinese government has promised to investigate the unidentified flying object that forced Xiaoshan...
- Heads Up Ufoers...this Is Your Day Of Celebration
"July 8, 1947: Roswell Incident Launches UFO Controversy" by Lewis Wallace July 7th, 2010 Wired Days after something shiny crashed in the New Mexico desert, the Roswell Army Air Field issues a press release that says the military has recovered the...
- Oxcart, Area 51, Ufos...great Urban Legend
"The Road to Area 51" After decades of denying the facility's existence, five former insiders speak out 2009 Los Angeles Times Area 51. It's the most famous military institution in the world that doesn't officially exist. If it did, it would...
- J. Reece Roth Conviction
J. Reece Roth I am not exactly sure of what to make of this back burner case involving a retired physicist and violation of US law regarding dissemination of sensitive military data. Yesterday a federal jury found J. Reece Roth guilty on 18 counts of...
Philosophy
British UFO data released
This stuff will not go away..."X Files"...British style.
"Britain Releases Batch of Files on UFO Sightings"
by
Gregory Katz
May 14th, 2008
Associated Press
by
Gregory Katz
May 14th, 2008
Associated Press
LONDON:
The men were air traffic controllers. Experienced, calm professionals. Nobody was drinking.
What they saw has never been explained. And they were so worried about losing their jobs that they demanded their names be kept off the official reports.
No one, they knew, would believe their claim that an unidentified flying object landed at the airfield they were overseeing in the east of England, touched down briefly, then took off again at tremendous speed.
But that's what they reported happening at four in the afternoon on April 19, 1984, at an unspecified small airport near the eastern coast of England. Their "Report of Unusual Aerial Phenomenon'' is one of more than 1,000 pages of formerly secret UFO documents released Wednesday by the National Archives.
The air traffic controllers, each with more than eight years on the job, describe how they were helping guide a small plane to a safe landing on runway 22 when they were distracted by a brightly lit object approaching a different runway without clearance.
"Everyone became aware that the object was unidentified,'' the report on the incident said. "SATCO (codename for a controller with 14 years experience) reports that the object came in 'at speed,' made a touch and go on runway 27, then departed at 'terrific speed' in a 'near vertical' climb.''
The incident is one of the more credible in the newly public files because it was reported by air traffic controllers, said David Clarke, a UFO expert who has worked with the National Archives on the document release.
"They were absolutely astonished,'' he said. "It was a bright, circular object, flashing different colors, and after it touched down it disappeared at fantastic speed. The report comes from very qualified people, and it's one of the few that remained unexplained.''
He said other incidents were at times reported by aircraft crews whose members also asked to remain anonymous because they did not want to jeopardize their careers by seeming to believe in UFOs.
In one case, the pilot of a commercial plane crossing the Atlantic reported an unidentified object just 1.5 nautical miles from his wing. He speculated that it might be a meteor or a missile.
Although there are some unexplained cases, there is no reported instance in which Britain's Ministry of Defense found any evidence of alien activity or alien spacecraft, said Clarke, who nonetheless expects conspiracy theories about a UFO coverup by the British defense establishment to persist.
"The Ministry of Defense doesn't have any evidence that our defenses were breached by alien craft,'' he said. "They never found one, no bits of one, that's all we can say.''
Clarke said the documents released Wednesday, dealing with the late 1970s and early 1980s, are the first batch of a series that will be made public in the next few years.
The National Archives is releasing the files now because of numerous Freedom of Information requests seeking information about the government's UFO reports. Officials said names of many individuals had been blacked out to protect their privacy and the entire files had been reviewed to make sure their release did not compromise national security.
Ministry of Defense officials indicate in the files that UFO reports were only investigated to make sure that no enemy aircraft had illegally entered British airspace. This was crucial during the Cold War when Russian planes posed an ongoing threat.
But officials say they did not try to solve the UFO riddles once an enemy attack had been ruled out.
The vast majority of the reports come from members of the public who see strange things in the sky and jump to the conclusion that a UFO is involved even though there is likely a logical scientific explanation for what they are observing, experts say.
"Mostly it's well-intentioned witnesses who are misidentifying things,'' said Nick Pope, another UFO expert who helped the Ministry of Defense investigate the phenomenon. "The most common things are aircraft lights, bright stars and planets, satellites, meteors, airships and things like that.''
Some of the reports are fairly easy to explain — and quite possibly influenced by a pint or two of beer. This was the case when a number of people leaving a Tunbridge Wells pub at 9:30 at night reported seeing a strange craft "with red and green'' lights.
Asked by police where it seemed to be traveling, the pub crawlers said it appeared to be heading for London's Gatwick Airport.
Case closed.
It didn't take a scientist to figure out it was a commercial plane making a routine approach.
The National Archives
I doubt if the truth is out there as claimed here...more of a psychological/social dependency?
Myths/science; science/myths--needed...compatible?
- Blame Kenneth Arnold For The "flying Saucer"
"The Man Who Introduced the World to Flying Saucers" Kenneth Arnold saw something, said something, and ushered in the UFO-industrial complex. by Megan Garber June 15th 2014 The Atlantic The plan was to launch a flying saucer. NASA's supersonic...
- Contingency Plan?...why Bother
UFO Flying Over China July 7th 2010 "If Mars Attacks …Do we have an alien-contact contingency plan?" by Juliet Lapidos July 16th, 2010 Slate The Chinese government has promised to investigate the unidentified flying object that forced Xiaoshan...
- Heads Up Ufoers...this Is Your Day Of Celebration
"July 8, 1947: Roswell Incident Launches UFO Controversy" by Lewis Wallace July 7th, 2010 Wired Days after something shiny crashed in the New Mexico desert, the Roswell Army Air Field issues a press release that says the military has recovered the...
- Oxcart, Area 51, Ufos...great Urban Legend
"The Road to Area 51" After decades of denying the facility's existence, five former insiders speak out 2009 Los Angeles Times Area 51. It's the most famous military institution in the world that doesn't officially exist. If it did, it would...
- J. Reece Roth Conviction
J. Reece Roth I am not exactly sure of what to make of this back burner case involving a retired physicist and violation of US law regarding dissemination of sensitive military data. Yesterday a federal jury found J. Reece Roth guilty on 18 counts of...